Legal Opinion

Dake v. Woodcock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating tbe facts). Appellant insists that the court erred in decreeing a foreclosure upon tbe mortgage and tbe rendition of tbe decree against tbe executor, tbe claim against the estate of Emily Dake not having been probated and being barred by tbe statute of nonclaim. Tbe suit was properly brought for foreclosure of tbe lien against tbe property mortgaged or conveyed by tbe deed of trust without probation of a claim against tbe estate of one of tbe makers, deceased, of the secured note. No judgment was sought against the estate of the decedent, but only foreclosure of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkmo Lumber Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Hall v. DencklaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873
  3. Mueller v. LightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wills v. Berberich's Delivery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Sharp v. PeaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API