Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 23, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,600Published

Action in ease for personal injuries. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

The Chicago City Railway Company, defendant below, seeks by this writ of error to reverse a judgment rendered against it in the Municipal Court for $400 for so negligently operating one of its street cars as to run into William Anderson, a boy ten years old, resulting in a broken leg.

The errors assigned are, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, that the boy was guilty of contributory negligence, and that the court erred in permitting the boy’s mother to testify that his “habits were good” before the accident and that he'had never before been injured by defendant’s cars.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stack v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. SanduskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. West Chicago Street R. R. v. StoltenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Fisher v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API