Legal Opinion
In re Estate of Ruhl
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1941No. 3293PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*251OPINION
By BARNES, J.
The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of the appeal on questions of law of James F. Ruhl from the judgment of the Probate Court of Franklin County, Ohio.
On or about September 2, 1939, James F. Ruhl, son of Jessie M. Ruhl, deceased, filed with the probate Court of Franklin County, Ohio, his complaint against Mark L. Ruhl, also son of decedent, and executor of her estate, charging the latter with having concealed or conveyed away moneys, goods, things in action or effects belonging to the estate of said decedent, in fraud of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Huntsman v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Patterson v. Gershow's Super Markets, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Teegarden v. TeegardenOhio Court of Appeals · 1947