Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Corrigan v. Perk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969No. 69-307Published

1DissentO’Neill, J.

The sole question in this case may be stated as follows: Where a qualified registered voter signs his name and correct address to a referendum petition, does the fact that the ward and precinct in which he resides do not appear on the petition following his name make his valid signature invalid?

The majority opinion holds that it does, but states no reasons in support of that holding.

I concur in the dissenting opinion of Justice Duncan.

*5The instant action is in prohibition. The relator seeks an order from this court which would deny to the electorate of Cuyahoga County the right to vote on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Patton v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Janasik v. SarosyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State, Em Rel. Donofrio v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. State ex rel. Wolson v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API