Legal Opinion

Linton v. Smith

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1941No. 2368-7644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

A. J. Smith et al. were plaintiffs in the trial court, plaintiffs in error in the Court of Civil Appeals, and are defendants in error here. It is thought that our opinion can be more easily followed by designating them as plaintiffs and the plaintiff in *644error, Vernon Linton, as defendant. The only question which we find it necessary to decide is the question of whether or not the Court of Civil Appeals ever acquired jurisdiction of this case. The opinion of that court appears i-n 130 S.W.2d 1108.

It is disclosed by the judgment in the trial court that the case came on for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kittrell v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Simpson v. Charity Benevolent Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. LintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fischer v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Judith E. Dean v. T. I. Dunnahue, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1990
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1984
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API