Legal Opinion
In re Roth
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1980No. 41615PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Proceeding to establish the incompetency of respondent as that standard is defined in § 475.010(3), RSMo. 1978. Appellant sought a determination that respondent was incompetent and, further, sought appointment as respondent’s guardian. The trial court found in favor of respondent, adjudging him competent, and appellant appeals this adverse decision. We affirm.
Appellant’s sole point on appeal is deficient, to-wit:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN THAT ITS FINDINGS THAT MASTIN JAMES ROTH WAS CAPABLE OF MANAGING HIS PROPERTY AND WAS NOT INCOMPETENT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 475.010(3), RSMO.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Roth v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- In Re the Alleged Incompetency of ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Best v. CulhaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Smitty's Super Markets, Inc. v. Retail Store Employees Local 322Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schulz v. SchulzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Strutton v. HuntingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993