Vincent v. Brant
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Forcible entry. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action for a forcible entry. The locus in quo is a room in the Hotel Benton, at Benton Harbor. Vincent was lessee of the hotel from Brant, and sublet the room in question to Iman & Whiteman for a billiard- room. Brant brought proceedings against Iman & Whiteman before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of the room, and obtained a judgment. An appeal was taken from this judgment in the name of Iman & Whiteman, but it was in fact taken by Vincent, who furnished the bond. The evidence on this trial tended to show that while this appeal was pending -- a secret…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCartney v. AuerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Steinhauser v. KuhnMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Newton v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beck's Service Stations, Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932