Legal Opinion

In re Lore

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The petitioner seeks by mandamus restoration to the position of pharmacist (non-competitive class) in the department of purchase, from which he was discharged on February 26, 1937. The basis of the application is that the petitioner was a veteran and thus entitled to the protection accorded veterans by subdivision 1 of section 22 of the Civil Service Law.

An alternative order was granted by Mr. Justice Valente to enable the petitioner “ to establish the facts on which he claims his status.” (N. Y. L. J. July 1, 1937, p. 5.)

The single issue evoked is presented by the petitioner’s averment and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Fonda v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lore v. ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Sullivan v. HobermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Blazejewski v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Chetney v. DashnerNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. City of New York v. City Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API