Heimer v. Johnson, Drake & Piper
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
This action was brought to recover for blasting damage, in which the jury, in response to questions propounded to it pursuant to CPLB 4111 (subd. [b]), found that the damage was causally related to vibrations from blasting, but that the defendants’ blasting operations were performed without negligence. The plaintiffs claim that decisional law in New York has steadily advanced and finally caught up with the almost universal rule imposing absolute liability for damages caused by blasting whether it be through vibration or by trespass.
This State has, of course, followed the rule in the Federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Holland House Co. v. . BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dixon v. New York Trap Rock Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Annutto v. Town of HerkimerNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Thomas v. Hendrickson Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Coalite, Inc. v. AldridgeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968