Cudahy Packing Co. v. Bixby
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Eon. Harris Robinson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, J.-
-Tins action, under the Carmack Amendment, is in four counts to recover damages to that many carloads of fresh meat respectively shipped from plaintiff’s packing plants at Kansas City and South Omaha to Pittsburg, Pa., Atlanta, G-a., New Haven, Conn., and Jacksonville, Fla. The shipments were made in Cudahy Refrigerator Line cars owned and furnished by plaintiff. They were loaded, iced and sealed by plaintiff at its packing plants and delivered to defendant for transporation under what has come to be known as “uniform” bills of lading, which contained instructions to the carrier…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bronstein v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- R. P. Hazzard Co. v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- United Mutual Fire Insurance v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Texas & N. O. R. v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920