Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Fillner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1938No. 7,739PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff brought this action in October, 1935, to obtain a decree awarding to her the custody and control of Marion Fill ner, a minor daughter of defendant, then of the age of seven years.

In general, the complaint alleged that defendant had placed the child in the custody of plaintiff! in July, 1932, pursuant to an agreement that plaintiff should have the exclusive control and custody of the child, the mother of the child being then deceased; that pursuant to the agreement plaintiff had ever since then clothed, fed, maintained and educated the child in her home, and that the best interests…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Striplin v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  4. In re StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. In Re GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of BieryMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bender v. BenderMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Foss v. LeiferMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Barbour v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Trudgen v. TrudgenMontana Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API