Legal Opinion
Tisdale v. Teleflex, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 22, 1985No. 82-1992-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
DUPREE, District Judge.
Invoking the court’s admiralty jurisdiction under Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure plaintiff, Mary Sally Tisdale, instituted this action for damages for personal injuries in August of 1982 against defendants, Teleflex, Inc. (Teleflex), Eldo Craft Manufacturing Company, Inc. 1 (Eldocraft) and Outboard Marine Corporation (OMC). Plaintiff alleges that she was severely and permanently injured in a boating accident which occurred on navigable waters near Charleston, South Carolina on October 27, 1979. The plaintiff’s cause of action is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Skyhook Corp. v. JasperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ahmed v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Barnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Ellis v. Tall Ships Charleston LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022