Kowalski v. Mohsenin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLatham, J.
In these consolidated negligence actions, the infant plaintiffs, Maryanne and Joanne Kowalski, appeal from so much of an order of the Special Term as denied their motion for summary judgment against defendants Cyrus Mohsenin and Bairley Auto Bental Corp. (in Action No. 1); and defendant Cofiniotis (in Action No. 1) cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs. The principal question is whether the Special Term erred in not granting summary judgment against Mohsenin and Bairley Auto Bental on the theory of collateral…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sweet v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wold v. Elder, Dempster & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weiner v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Duverney v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1978
- Shaid v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Boyd v. TrentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Stoughton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976