Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Tutweiler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1924No. 3915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs below, plaintiffs in error here, brought separate suits for an injury to Mrs. Mathis when she was struck by the car of the Memphis Street Railway Company. The two cases were consolidated for trial. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant, at the end of plaintiff’s testimony.

After dark Mrs. Mathis prepared to take a car at its regular stopping place. When the approaching car was a short distance away, she stepped off the curb down to near the track and waited. The distance from curb to rail was 12 feet. When the car wks some 60 or 70 feet away, she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Richards v. H. K. Mulford Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Nelson v. Ohio Cultivator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Sova v. First Nat. Bk. of FerndaleWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cox v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R. Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  5. Winifred Bolam and Christiane Massias v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API