Legal Opinion

Sizer v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 28, 2017No. 1/17Published

1Opinion of the Court

Jamal Sizer v. State of Maryland, No. 1, September Term, 2017. Opinion by Greene, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – REASONABLE SUSPICION The Court of Appeals held that the hearing court erred in suppressing evidence that was seized after a Terry stop because the hearing court did not consider the totality of the circumstances. On the basis that an officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, an officer may conduct a Terry investigatory stop. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868,

20 L. Ed. 2d 889

(1969). When reviewing whether reasonable suspicion exists, a…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API