Legal Opinion
Loomis v. Bragg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Action on a contract for the purchase of a piano; brought to the City Court of the city of New Haven. Demurrer to complaint. Judgment for defendant, (Stuckley, J.) Motion in error by the plaintiff. The ease is fully •stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.
This suit grows out of the following contract between the parties:
“Agreement between C. M. Loomis of New Haven, Conn., and James D. Bragg of Bridgeport, Conn. Said Loomis agrees to rent, and said Bragg agrees to hire, one Albert W. Ladd & Co. piano, No. 1807, price $140, (cash $5, balance $185,) for the term of twenty-seven months from the fifth day of January, 1881, at the rent of five dollars per month, payable on the fifth day of each month, in advance. And it is agreed that if the rent and interest shall be paid punctually according to agreement, said instrument shall be the property of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hine v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Crompton v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Williams v. LilleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Herring-Marvin Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.