Legal Opinion
In re William Harold Thomas
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 23, 2020No. 20-8002Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8024-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8014-1(c). File Name: 20b0009n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR., │ Debtor. │ ___________________________________________ │ > No. 20-8002 WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR., │ Appellant, │ │ v. │ │ │ OFFICE OF THE TENNESSEE ATTORNEY GENERAL; │ MICHAEL WILLEY, Senior Assistant Attorney General, │ Appellees. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bullard v. Blue Hills BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.