Julius Ingram v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The motion before us presents a simple but important issue. Petitioner filed in this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a pro se petition for leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis, which in a confused and inartful way complained of his conviction in the District Court under an indictment charging assault, with a dangerous weapon and assault with intent to kill. In accordance with our practice, we appointed counsel for the reason that petitioner personally was. not qualified to analyze his case or perfect and present points for appeal. *30Later, at the request of assigned counsel, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chauncey W. Whitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- State v. MylesNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.