Legal Opinion
State v. Barba
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 14, 1913No. 19,873PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; F. D. Chretien, Judge. Arthur Barba was convicted of violating Act 245 of 1912, § 1, limiting the hours of employment, and from a reversal of such conviction by the criminal district court the State appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
Arthur Barba, general manager and secretary of the New Orleans lee Manufacturing Company, was charged in the Second city criminal court of the parish of Orleans with violating section 1 of Act 245 of 1912, which, leaving out the enacting clause, reads as follows:
“That no factory, manufacturing establishment, office building, warehouse, workshop, or any business establishment running day and night, shall permit except in cases of emergency, or compel the stationary fireman therein employed to work consecutively in any one day, more than eight hours; that a full day’s labor shall be composed of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. GoodwillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Godcharles & Co. v. WigemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
- Gasque, Inc. v. NatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- State v. LegendreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Harry's Hardware, Inc. v. ParsonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.