Jean-Baptiste v. Tobias
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendants met their prima facie burden of showing, on their cross motion, that neither of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 351 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). However, the Supreme Court erred in failing to find that the plaintiffs, in opposition, raised a triable issue of fact.
The plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff Gamaliel Jean-Baptiste sustained a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Black v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rivera v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pineda v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Chiu Yuan Hu v. FrenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Hong Ki Kim v. DesmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Kyung Kook Chang v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.