Moses v. McWilliams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CIRILLO, President Judge,
concurring and dissenting:
Because I disagree with the majority’s resolution of the issues involved in this case, I respectfully dissent in part and concur in part. I agree with the majority’s disposition of the defamation claim before us. I believe, however, that some cause of action should exist in this Commonwealth for a physician’s breach of the duty of confidentiality to a patient. Because the majority finds that Moses is precluded from stating a claim for breach by her underlying medical malpractice action, it fails to reach this issue. I would hold that such a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Buczek v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.