Legal Opinion

Massaro v. National Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The appeal is from a nonsuit in an action upon a fire insurance policy. The Fulton Savings Bank had an interest as mortgagee in a fire insurance policy covering a dwelling belonging to the estate of James A. Foster, who died in 1915. A fire damaged the dwelling on May 11, 1929. This plaintiff claims to have succeeded to the rights of the mortgagee under the fire insurance policy through a written assignment made after the fire. The administrator with the will annexed of the estate of James A. Foster brought a proceeding under sections 234 to 240 of the Surrogate’s Court Act to sell the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brighton Beach Racing Ass'n v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Rea v. M'EachronNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Brighton Beach Racing Association v. . Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Massaro v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massaro v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Bleiweis v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Massaro v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API