Legal Opinion

Oklahoma v. New Mexico

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1991No. 109 ORIGPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

This case, an original action brought by the States of Oklahoma and Texas against the State of New Mexico, arises out of a dispute over the interpretation of various provisions of the Canadian River Compact (Compact), which was ratified by New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas in 1951 and consented to by Congress by the Act of May 17, 1952, 66 Stat. 74. Each State has filed exceptions to a report submitted by the Special Master (Report) appointed by this Court.

*2241 — I

The Canadian River1 is an interstate river which rises along the boundary between southeastern Colorado and northeastern New Mexico, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. United States v. Kirk Gayle, Ann-Marie Richardson, Rohan IngramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Wayne Land & Mineral Grp. LLC v. Del. River Basin Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. HerrmannSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API