Legal Opinion
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corp. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 2003No. 02 CIV. 9614(RMB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
The application by ORIX Capital Markets, LLC (“ORIX”), as set forth in Mr. Yudell’s letter, dated February 27, 2003, for the Court, inter alia, to vacate the parties’ stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(ii), dated February 27, 2003, is respectfully denied for two principal reasons:
First, there is no “case or controversy” pending in light of the dismissal. See Mut. Produce, Inc. v. Penn Cent. Transp. Co., 119 F.R.D. 619, 620-21 (D.Mass.l988)(denying motion to intervene because stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(l)(ii)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hester Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Tyson Foods, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Alternative Research & Development Foundation v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Mutual Produce, Inc. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. WynneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. SYNTHON LABORATORIES, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008