Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Gordon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1988No. 86-1313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Patricia Gordon, appealed from a denial of her motion for a psychiatric examination. She maintains that she was at trial, and still is, incapable of "aiding or assisting" her attorney in the preparation of a defense. We reverse and remand.

Gordon was charged with theft of property in the first degree. She pleaded guilty to the theft charge following the trial court's denial of her motion for a psychiatric examination. She was convicted. She appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals, arguing that it was error to deny her motion. That court affirmed her conviction and later denied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Pace v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  3. Ex Parte JanezicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API