Legal Opinion

Casey-Goldsmith v. Goldsmith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 1999No. 99-1221Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

DAUKSCH, J.

Petitioner seeks to have us clarify or explain the reason for the denial of her petition for writ of certiorari. We had denied it without opinion and she says:

In order to avoid future confusion and misinterpretation of this Court’s intentions, Petitioner requests this Court to rehear and to clarify the meaning of its “denial” of the subject Petition. Petitioner wishes to avoid the possibility that this Court’s unfavorable disposition of her petition for discretionary interlocutory review will be treated as a determination on the merits of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Bevan v. WanickaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Degrasse v. WertheimDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API