Legal Opinion
State v. Zysk
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 13, 1983No. 82-164PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
The defendant, Charles Zysk, appeals his convictions for burglary, RSA 635:1, and theft by unauthorized taking or transfer, RSA 637:3, arising from the burglary of AAmco Transmission (AAmco) in Manchester.
On September 19, 1980, the defendant went to AAmco in Manchester in an effort to regain his job as transmission rebuilder. While he was at the shop, he discovered that a tool box which he had left at the shop had been forced open and that certain of his tools were missing. That evening, AAmco was burglarized. A set of “Snap-On” auto mechanic tools in a roll-away chest and a set of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. AubertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. BirdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. BrodeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.