Legal Opinion

Snap v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1857PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR TO FRANKLIN. This cause was tried at September term, 1857, of the Franklin Circuit Court. The defendants below, plaintiffs here, were convicted and fined fifty dollars each. A motion to quash, and also for a new trial, were made, and overruled. The cause was tried by Parrish, Judge. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Catón, C. J.

The plaintiffs in error were indicted for “ unlawfully, willfully and wantonly shooting and wounding a certain, mare,” etc. The proof showed that Snap, by the direction of Francis, shot the mare with fine shot, inflicting a wound upon her flank, from which she recovered. The mare, at the time, was trespassing in a field of oats belonging to one of the plaintiffs in error, which was protected by an insufficient fence.

The statute under which this indictment was found, provides, that if any person “ shall unlawfully, wantonly, willfully or maliciously kill, wound, disfigure or…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bennefield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. State v. PraterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Pueblo v. ValdésSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1916
  4. State v. SillbaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API