Miscione v. Bishop
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for new trial after a trial involving the incorrect execution of a promissory note.
In 1972, appellants (the Misciones) agreed to sell an unimproved lot to appellees (the Bishops). The Bishops agreed to pay $3,000 down and to give a mortgage securing a promissory note in which they would be obligated to pay the remaining purchase price as follows: One-tenth of the principal plus 7% interest per year, with the right to prepay without penalty. Unknown to the Misciones, the real estate agent prepared the note. It stated:
“.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Earven v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Fogleman v. Peruvian AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Gomez v. DykesArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Gurske v. StrateNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Hillsdale Nat. Bank v. SansoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Rhue v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Ponderosa Plaza v. SiplastCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Schmidt v. American LeascoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Phil Bramsen Distributor, Inc. v. MastroniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.