Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 19, 1999No. 05-97-01340-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH B. MORRIS, Justice.

In this appeal we determine whether a defendant, whose case has been previously reversed and remanded solely for a new punishment hearing, may introduce evidence at the new hearing to support his contention that he was not the person who committed the crime. Darryl Jerome Williamson successfully obtained post-conviction habeas corpus relief because his counsel rendered ineffective assistance at the punishment stage of his burglary trial. On remand from the habeas corpus proceeding, the trial court held a new punishment hearing. Appellant now challenges the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Asberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  2. Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Nixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Bisby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Mayfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Alex Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API