Legal Opinion

D'AURIZIO v. Borough of Palisades Park

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 29, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-4417 (NHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Albert D’Aurizio, the plaintiff in this civil rights action, seeks to compel a nonparty witness, Susan Spohn, to answer certain deposition questions intended to secure evidence of how she voted in a school board election and in several general elections. The issue was brought to my attention during a conference. I directed the parties to submit letter briefs. I heard oral argument on September 26, 1995. 1

DISCUSSION

Plaintiff describes the “background” for his application as follows:

This is an action for political termination of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spencer Sav. Bank, SLA v. Excell Mortg. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API