D'AURIZIO v. Borough of Palisades Park
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEDGES, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Albert D’Aurizio, the plaintiff in this civil rights action, seeks to compel a nonparty witness, Susan Spohn, to answer certain deposition questions intended to secure evidence of how she voted in a school board election and in several general elections. The issue was brought to my attention during a conference. I directed the parties to submit letter briefs. I heard oral argument on September 26, 1995. 1
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff describes the “background” for his application as follows:
This is an action for political termination of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spencer Sav. Bank, SLA v. Excell Mortg. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997