Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Winbush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 16, 1926No. 6 Div. 740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

We have examined the several demurrers directed to pleas and find no reversible error. If there be technical error in ruling on plea 7, its comparison with plea 3, to which demurrer was overruled, indicates that no error was committed in sustaining demurrer to plea 7. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Witte, 190 Ala. 327, 67 So. 263; Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Crenshaw, 195 Ala. 263, 70 So. 768. The latter was no broader than plea 3 and presented the same defense.

Demurrers were sustained to pleas 9 and 10. The provisions of the contract as to good or sound health are within the power of contract of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Dwight Manufacturing Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. MannAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API