Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert S. Luce

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 23, 2017No. 16-4093PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) was enacted in order to increase home ownership. In service of this goal, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), which is statutorily tasked with implementing the FHA, offers insurance to certain mortgage lenders in order to decrease the risk borne by private industry and thus encourage lending. HUD maintains the viability of this scheme through a number of measures. One such measure prohibits individuals with criminal records from owning, or being employed by, a mortgage company.

The United States brought this action against…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. StrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Victor E. Bibby v. Mortgage Investors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. United States Ex Rel. Prather v. Brookdale Senior Living Cmtys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. International Brotherhood Elec v. Farfield CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API