Legal Opinion

Oucho Saelee and Lai Chiem Saelee v. Julio Hernandez et al

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 29, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00735Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 OUCHO SAELEE and LAI CHIEM CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00735-TL SAELEE, 12 ORDER ON PETITIONERS’ Petitioners, MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 13 v. 14 JULIO HERNANDEZ et al, 15 Respondents. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Clarification (Dkt. No. 11) brought by 18 Petitioners Oucho Saelee and Lai Chiem Saelee. The Court ordered Respondents to file a 19 response, if they had one, by today, June 29, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 14 (“Order for 20 Response”). Respondents filed their response on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Lansford-Coaldale Joint Water Authority, in No. 92-7605 v. Tonolli Corporation Tonolli Canada, Ltd. Ifim International B v. in No. 92-7671Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API