Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1991No. 9028SC1356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his Rule 60(b)(2) motion for relief from judgment based on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. Defendant contends that his former employee’s testimony constitutes newly discovered evidence because the witness could not, with due diligence, have been located prior to trial. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A, Rule 60(b)(2) provides:

Relief from judgment or order.

* * *(b) Mistakes; inadvertence; excusable neglect; newly discovered evidence; fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Family Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Cole v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walraven v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Morgan v. Nash CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. YerbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Parks v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API