Michael Neuman v. Alan Crogan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Petitioner Michael Richard Neuman (Neuman) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition premised on the prosecutor’s allegedly improper use of peremptory challenges to exclude “people of color” from the jury in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, we must defer to the state court’s determination that there was no purposeful discrimination unless its decision was:…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Delbert Paulino v. R.A. Castro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. NeumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009