Bagley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery. The case presents rather a novel condition of things on the face of the indictment. The original indictment, properly certified and designated, has been sent up by order of the trial court for the inspection of this court. The indictment contains two counts, one for forgery, and the other for passing the alleged forged instrument. It is unnecessary to notice the first inasmuch as it was not submitted to the jury, and therefore, passes out of the case.
1. The second count charges that appellant willfully, knowingly and fraudulently…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Carder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Jessup v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Acuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- T. J. Updack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Southwestern Settlement & Development Co. v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Carloss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.