Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1984No. 83-539PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented by this petition for mandamus is whether the trial court abused its discretion by permitting appellee (respondent Strong) to modify the record on appeal, pursuant to Rule 10 (f), Ala.R.App.P., more than seven days after appellants (petitioners Edwards and Jordan Machine Shop, Inc.) had designated the record on appeal. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and we deny the writ.

On December 5, 1983, Barbara Edwards and Jordan Machine Shop, Inc., defendants below, gave notice of their intention to appeal a judgment of September 19, 1983, and a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. McDowell-Purcell, Inc. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Trimble v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Walker v. EubanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prattville Memorial Chapel v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Saffold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Cupps v. UptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Prattville Memorial Chapel v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API