Legal Opinion

Tousley v. Tousley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent failed to contend before Family Court that alcohol abuse and refusal of treatment do not constitute aggravating circumstances within the meaning of Family Court Act § 827 (a) (vii) and § 842. Thus, respondent failed to preserve for our review his present contention that the court erred in issuing a three-year order of protection based on his alcohol abuse and refusal of treatment (see generally, Matter of Tanya R. B. v Darren W., 254 AD2d 813; Matter of Mary Alice V., 222 AD2d 594, lv denied 87 NY2d 811; Matter of Kagels v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Alice V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kagels v. KagelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Tanya R. B. v. Darren W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API