Legal Opinion

Hormel International Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 13, 1976, which, inter alia, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327. Order reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, and complaint dismissed. On this appeal, in an action to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the issue is whether Special Term’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327 (forum non…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Irrigation & Industrial Development Corp. v. Indag S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Fertel v. Resorts International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. v. ICICI Bank Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. International Customs Associates, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API