Legal Opinion

Bell v. Swainsboro Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1912No. 4480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Swainsboro—Judge H. R. Daniel. October 5, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

A contract made by an infant is not void, but merely voidable) upon Ms election, either during minority or within a reasonable time after majority, to disaffirm. Strain v. Wright, 7 Ga. 568; Gonackey v. General Accident Assurance Corporation, 6 Ga. App. 381 (65 S. E. 53); Bentley v. Greer, 100 Ga. 35 (27 S. E. 974); Vinson v. State, 124 Ga. 19 (52 S. E. 79). Retention after majority of the fruits of a contract made during infancy may amount to ratification. Civil Code (1910), § 4233; Williams v. Torley, 136 Ga. 594 (71 S. E. 881, 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 57). But even where' the consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gonackey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Strain v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Wickham v. TorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Vinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Bentley v. GreerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kytle v. KytleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Levy v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Clyde v. Steger & Sons Piano Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API