Legal Opinion · Dissent

Granby v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1895Published

Error to Macomb. (Eldredge, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are-stated in the opinions.

1DissentGrant, J.

Two colts, one belonging to-the plaintiff and the other to a Mr. Stead, were pastured in Mr. Stead’s field, adjoining the defendant’s road on the-west. A gate opened from this field into the defendant’s-right of way, where there was a farm crossing, leading to-Mr. Stead’s farm on the east. The eastern gate to the-crossing was considerably south of the western gate. Some one left the western gate open, through which the colts-entered the right of way. There is no testimony showing-who left the gate open. It is, however, conceded that it-was not the defendant. The accident happened between 6:30…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. NobleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Darling v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BarlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co. v. TateMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Howard v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API