Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Wise

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 24, 1937No. 1689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. W. Cecil, being indebted to Oscar Wise for approximately $1,000, the balance of the purchase price of a stock of goods, executed and delivered to Wise as evidence of said debt, or a part thereof, and in renewal thereof, five notes dated April 23, 1932, aggregating $679.34, with 8 per cent. interest from the several maturity dates thereof. As security for said notes Cecil, being the owner of an installment vendor's lien note for the principal original sum of $1,600, which was executed by W. A. Stagner, payable to J. M. Chaney, and providing for 8 per cent. interest, etc., transferred same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Factors' & Traders' Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In re Platteville Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1906
  3. In re Saxton Furnace Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Parmley v. AynesworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spillman Investment Group, Ltd. v. American Bank (In Re Spillman Development Group, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Wise v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Wise v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API