Legal Opinion

Waldo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 25, 2001No. 3D00-3012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

2Per curiam

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to appoint counsel to represent defendant, Larry Waldo, at his resentencing hearing. Resentencing is a critical stage in which a defendant has the right to be present and has the right to have the assistance of counsel. See Chestnut v. State, 578 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Woodson v. State, 111 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the sentences and remand for resen-tencing.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chestnut v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003