Legal Opinion

Howell v. The Ohio State Highway Patrol Subdivision

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 2, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00510Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LAKISHA HOWELL, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cv-510 v. Black, J. Bowman, M.J. THE OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL SUBDIVISION, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Lakisha Howell initiated this action by filing a complaint on July 25, 2018 that alleged that three Defendants had violated her constitutional rights. Pursuant to local practice, the case was referred to the undersigned for initial review and for a report and recommendation on any dispositive motions. Due to the early dismissal of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API