Legal Opinion

People v. Biocic

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 1967No. Gen. 50,988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Defendant was indicted for the crime of obscenity under two indictments charging him with the sale of two nudist magazines. The trial judge found that the magazines were not obscene as a matter of law and that they were entitled to the protection afforded by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Both indictments were dismissed on motion of defendant. The People appealed under Supreme Court Rule 17(4) then in effect.

One indictment charged that defendant “committed the offense of obscenity, in that he, with knowledge of the nature or content thereof, sold an obscene book, to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. The People v. WallenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. House v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  3. People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. People v. MacKAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Bridson v. Maywood Cab Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API