Legal Opinion

Minnesota Debenture Co. v. United Real Estate Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1906No. Nos. 14,735—(35)Published

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Dickinson, J., denying its motion to vacate the findings and decision and to grant a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Action to determine adverse claims, and respondent’s title depends upon the validity of a certain notice of expiration of time for redemption in certain tax proceedings. The premises in question were sold at the regular tax sale in May, 1900, for the unpaid delinquent taxes of 1898, were bid in by the state under a tax judgment, duly rendered, and on May 11, 1900, the state assigned its certificates of sale to respondent, and the county auditor issued notices of the expiration of the time for redemption on December 16, 1904. The amount stated'in the notice of redemption did not include the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peabody v. Citizens State Bank of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State v. KippSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. State v. KippSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Allen v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API