In re Craig

CONCURRING OPINION OP

PERRY, J.

Of the respondent’s contentions that as the petitioner does not claim to have paid or tendered the amount of the license fee required by section 2 of Act. 48 he is not in a position to raise any question other than that of the validity of the single requirement as to the foe, and that in any event because the petitioner has not obtained a license under the statute he should not be allowed to raise any question as to the validity of any of the conditions or restrictions imposed by the statute upon licensees, as well as of his further contention that, even though…