Legal Opinion
Daland v. Hewitt Soap Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The action was removed from the state court. The present motion is by the plaintiff to remand it.
The action was brought in the New York Supreme Court. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a resident of New York and the defendant an Ohio corporation ; that the plaintiff’s predecessor had adopted the trademark “Smiles” for soap and had caused it to be registered in the Patent Office; that the trademark was the property of the plaintiff by assignment and was “of great value”; that the defendant as well as a predecessor whose liabilities it had assumed ha"d used…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Ruth Lopez v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. Eastern States CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Robinson v. Quality InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1986
- Horak v. Color Metal of Zurich, SwitzerlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.