Tompkins v. Hunter
New York Supreme Court
Action by Charles M. Tompkins and others against Charles Hunter, the First national Bank of Penn Yan, and another, to have a conveyance by the first to the second named defendant set aside, as in fraud of plaintiffs, and for other relief.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
There is no substantial dispute about the facts. The defendant Hunter, for some time prior and up to April 21, 1890, had been engaged in the business of grocer and produce dealer at Penn Yan, H. Y. He was then indebted to the defendant bank in about the sum of $29,000. He had other creditors, and his entire indebtedness amounted to about $36,000. On that dáy he conveyed all his real estate to the First national Bank of Penn Yan, and transferred to it all- his personal property, except such as was exempt from levy and sale on execution. This conveyance and transfer were made by Hunter to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Preston v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Karst v. . GaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- White v. CotzhausenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Fitzgerald v. . QuannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Manning v. . BeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Cutter v. PollockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Lassiter v. HoesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1895
- Tompkins v. HunterNew York Supreme Court · 1894